| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology and
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and
3 Department of Molecular Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Requests for reprints: Michael Ohh, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8 Canada. Phone: (416) 946-7922; Fax: (416) 978-5959. E-mail: michael.ohh{at}utoronto.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
subunit of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) transcription factor for subsequent destruction by the 26S proteasome. Here, we report the identification and characterization of the first VHL homologue, VHL-like protein (VLP), located on chromosome 1q21.2. A 676-bp partial cDNA encoding a 139-amino acid protein that is 78% similar to VHL was isolated by reverse transcription-PCR from human brain cerebellum and several cancer cell lines. The expression of VLP transcript is most abundant in the placenta. Like VHL, VLP contains a ß domain capable of binding HIF
. However, unlike VHL, it does not contain a recognizable
domain, which is required for nucleating the multiprotein E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. The increased expression of VLP in the presence of VHL attenuated the ubiquitination of HIF
and led to the accumulation of downstream HIF target genes. These results taken together indicate that VLP functions as a dominant-negative VHL to serve as a protector of HIF
. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(HIF
) during normoxia, and the consequential inappropriate up-regulation of hypoxia-inducible genes such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), transferrin (TF), transferrin receptor (TFRC), and erythropoietin (EPO; 1).
It is now evident that VHL is a vital component of a multiprotein E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that consists of elongin B, elongin C, Rbx1, and Cul2 (1, 5, 6). VHL contains an
domain and a ß domain (7). The former is required for binding elongin C, thereby bridging VHL to the rest of the E3 complex (7, 8). The latter functions as a putative substrate-docking site that directly binds HIF
(7, 9). However, oxygen-dependent hydroxylation of conserved proline residues within the oxygen-dependent degradation (ODD) domain of HIF
by a class of prolyl hydroxylases (PHD) is a requisite step in this recognition by VHL (1015). Thus, under normal oxygen tension, VHL ubiquitin ligase complex selectively ubiquitinates the prolyl-hydroxylated form of HIF
. Importantly, the disease-associated VHL mutants are unable to target the prolyl-hydroxylated HIF
for ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis due to their failure to form an active E3 complex (i.e.,
domain mutation) or to their inability to recognize prolyl-hydroxylated HIF
(i.e., ß domain mutation; 9, 16, 17). Consequently, cells lacking a wild-type VHL show stable HIF
subunits, which binds to the constitutively non-labile HIFß [also known as ARNT (aryl-hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator)] subunit. This active heterodimeric transcription factor induces the transcription of numerous hypoxia-inducible genes, such as the aforementioned VEGF, EPO, TF, TFRC, and GLUT1, and initiates an inappropriate physiological response to hypoxia (1).
Oxygen homeostasis is paramount for the normal functioning of a cell. It follows then that the mechanisms governing oxygen homeostasis is not only precise, but also complex, occurring at multiple levels. First, there are multiple
subunits of HIF: HIF-1
, HIF-2
, and HIF-3
, all capable of transactivating promoters/enhancers containing hypoxia-responsive elements (HRE; 1824). Second, under normal oxygen tension, prolyl hydroxylation on HIF
promotes the binding of VHL E3 ubiquitin complex (12, 14, 15), while asparaginyl hydroxylation on HIF
prevents the binding of transcriptional co-activators CBP/p300 (25). This dual posttranslational regulation safeguards against inappropriate activation of hypoxia-inducible genes under normal oxygen tension. Recently, a dominant-negative regulator of murine HIF-1 called mIPAS (murine inhibitor of PAS containing proteins), which lacks transactivation and ODD domains, was identified as an alternatively spliced variant of mHIF-3
(20, 21). mIPAS dimerizes with mHIF-1
subunit and consequently prevents the interaction of mHIF-1
to mHIF-ß subunits (20, 21). Furthermore, mIPAS/mHIF-1
complex does not bind to the HRE of target genes (20, 21). Thus, mIPAS inhibits hypoxia-mediated transcriptional activation. Adding to the complexity of mechanisms governing oxygen homeostasis, we report here the identification and functional characterization of the first VHL homologue, VHL-like protein (VLP).
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
domain required for nucleating an E3 ligase complex (represented by a dashed line in Fig. 1C).
|
domain in VLP is caused by a frameshift due to one base insertion and one base deletion in the VLP gene and not due to the lack of nucleotides corresponding to the exon 3 of VHL. This raises the possibility that a frameshift mutation is observed in certain cancer cell lines, but may not be present in normal cells. A blast search of the GenBank revealed a 5' EST isolated from human brain cerebellum (Accession No.: AA324790) located upstream of the presented VLP cDNA. This EST sequence overlapped with VLP cDNA by 24 bp and contained an in-frame stop codon (-69 to -67) upstream of the first methionine codon (Fig. 1B), suggesting the expression of VLP in human brain cerebellum. We performed RT-PCR using RNA extracted from the human brain cerebellum and amplified an identical 676-bp cDNA. A negative control without reverse transcriptase did not generate the 676-bp fragment, suggesting that the RT-PCR amplicons were not generated from a contaminating genomic DNA. This result supports the notion that VLP is naturally missing an
domain. Bradley and Rothberg (26) previously reported a partial 218-bp DNA fragment, which is possibly a VHL-processed pseudogene. This DNA fragment is identical to the nucleotides 186403 of presented VLP cDNA. Northern analysis was performed on several human tissue types and they found that the probe of this VHL-processed pseudogene cross-hybridized with VHL mRNA transcripts and showed no unique transcript. We have performed similar Northern analysis on multiple human tissue blot using the VLP coding sequence (from 111 to 530) and VHL coding region as probes. Although both probes showed common transcripts at 4.5 kb (Fig. 2A), the 3- and 1-kb transcripts in the placenta were detected only by the VLP probe (Fig. 2A). This strongly suggests the existence of VLP mRNA in the placenta. It is likely that the 218-bp probe used by Bradley and Rothberg, which contained just 48 mismatches (while our probe contained 145 mismatches) against the VHL cDNA, was insufficient to provide the unique Northern signature of VLP.
|
domain (Fig. 1C). We next asked whether VLP protein is expressed in the placenta. In the absence of anti-VLP antibody, we tested the existing anti-VHL antibodies to determine whether they cross-react with VLP due to the high degree of similarity between the two proteins (Fig. 2B). 35S-in vitro translated hemagglutinin (HA)-VLP was immunoprecipitated with both monoclonal (IG32) and polyclonal (R98) anti-VHL antibody, separated on SDS-PAGE, and visualized by autoradiography. R98 immunoprecipitated HA-VLP, albeit at a lower affinity than the anti-HA antibody, while IG32 failed to immunoprecipitate HA-VLP (Fig. 2B). Next, we prepared whole cell extracts of primary placental tissue, ran on SDS-PAGE along with in vitro translated untagged-VLP, and immunoblotted with R98 antibody (Fig. 2C). A band co-migrating with the untagged-VLP was present in the lane loaded with placental extract, strongly suggesting that the VLP mRNA detected via Northern analysis translated into VLP protein in the placenta. Furthermore, this protein was clearly not VHL because it did not co-migrate with VHL proteins (full-length VHL30 or internally translated VHL19) that were immunoprecipitated from ACHN cells that express endogenous VHL (see lanes 3 and 4 in Fig. 2C). Moreover, the protein band representing VLP in the placenta did not hybridize against the IG32 anti-VHL antibody, suggesting that this is not an alternatively spliced or modified VHL (data not shown). It should nevertheless be cautioned that in the absence of VLP-specific antibody, it is formally possible that the protein representing VLP in the placenta is yet another protein that cross-reacts with an anti-VHL polyclonal antibody.
VLP Binds to the
Subunit of HIF, but Fails to Associate With VHL-Associated E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Components
The substrate-docking ß domain of VHL binds HIF-1/2/3
via the ODD domain (7, 9, 22). This recognition requires, at a minimum, oxygen-dependent hydroxylation of a conserved proline residue within the ODD (12, 14, 15). To address whether the putative ß domain of VLP could likewise bind ODD of HIF-1
, we performed an in vitro binding assay between in vitro translated 35S-labeled HA-tagged VLP and in vitro translated unlabeled ODD(WT) or ODD(P-A) containing P564A substitution, in the presence of PHD-enriched cellular extracts (Fig. 3A). VHL was analyzed in the experiment as an internal control. ODD(WT) clearly bound VLP and, as expected, VHL. However, unlike VHL, VLP bound equally well to ODD(P-A) (Fig. 3A). This suggests that VLP recognizes ODD irrespective of its prolyl hydroxylation status.
|
residue 556575. The ODD peptide-(OH) contains hydroxyproline at position 564, while ODD peptide (P-A) contains a proline to alanine substitution at that position. These biotin-conjugated peptides were mixed with either 35S-labeled VHL or VLP, precipitated with streptavidin-coated beads, and visualized by autoradiography (Fig. 3B). Although VHL bound only to ODD peptide-(OH), VLP bound both ODD peptide-(OH) and ODD peptide (P-A) with relatively equal affinity (Fig. 3B). This was recapitulated in an in vitro binding assay using full-length HIF-1
protein (Fig. 3C). The full-length HIF-1
bound VLP, but failed to bind HIF-1
devoid of ODD (Fig. 3C). This suggests that P402, which has also been implicated in regulating the binding to VHL, is not required for binding VLP. However, because HIF-1
devoid of ODD is a gross deletion mutant that might have aberrant conformation, it is still formally possible that P402 plays a minor role in regulating the binding of VLP. Furthermore, as observed with ODD or ODD-derived synthetic peptides, HIF-1
with P564A retained its ability to bind VLP. These results, taken together, strongly suggest that VLP recognizes HIF-1
via ODD independent of its prolyl hydroxylation status. It should, however, be noted that the binding of VLP to HIF-1
(ODD) was noticeably weaker than VHL to HIF-1
(ODD).
HIF-1
(ODD) makes five key contacts on VHL at residues W88, Y98, S111, H115, and W117 (27). S111 and H115 are critical residues of the hydrophobic core within the ß domain of VHL that most likely associate with the hydroxyproline of ODD (27). This is thought to be central to the specificity of VHL binding to HIF-1
. Interestingly, 4 out of these 5 residues are conserved on VLP (Fig. 1C). The exception, the residue corresponding to S111 of VHL, is N93 on VLP (Fig. 1C). This and other differences in residues surrounding the key contact sites may be the reason why VLP does not preferentially bind to the prolyl-hydroxylated HIF-1
(ODD). To test this hypothesis, we generated VHL with 111SYRG114 to NFRS substitution and VLP with 92NFRS95 to SYRG substitution. These mutants were tested for their ability to bind biotin-conjugated ODD peptide-(OH) and ODD peptide (P-A) (Fig. 3D). VHL (SYRG to NFRS) mutant bound not only ODD peptide-(OH), but also ODD peptide (P-A) (Fig. 3D). Thus, this VHL mutant had a binding profile similar to that of the wild-type VLP. The VLP ( 92NFRS95 to SYRG) mutant, unlike its wild-type counterpart, bound more preferentially to ODD peptide-(OH) (Fig. 3D). Thus, this binding profile was reminiscent of the wild-type VHL requiring the hydroxylation of proline on ODD for recognition. Although the binding affinity was markedly lower than their wild-type counterparts (data not shown), these results demonstrate that subtle amino acid differences surrounding S111 and H115 (position numbers on VHL) are important in determining the specificity of binding to prolyl-hydroxylated HIF-1
(ODD). Interestingly, S111, H115, and the residues in between (i.e., SYRGH) are perfectly conserved on mVLP (see Fig. 1C). Whether mVLP preferentially recognizes prolyl-hydroxylated HIF-1
, like VHL and unlike human VLP, remains to be determined.
The primary sequence indicates that the
domain, which is required for bridging VHL to elongins B/C, Cul2, and Rbx1 (79), is absent in VLP (see Fig. 1C). To explore whether VLP is incapable of forming a VHL-like E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, we transiently transfected U2OS cells with mammalian expression plasmid encoding HA-VLP or HA-VHL as a control. The cells were then lysed, immunoprecipitated with an anti-HA antibody, and the bound proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3E). As expected, VHL co-immunoprecipitated Cul2, a scaffold protein of the VHL E3 complex. However, VLP failed to co-precipitate Cul2 (Fig. 3E). This suggests that VLP without an
domain lacks the ability to bind the components of the VHL E3 ligase complex.
VLP Functions as a Dominant-Negative VHL
Although VLP did not associate with VHL-associated proteins, it was formally possible that VLP could interact with other proteins to act as an E3 ubiquitin ligase to target HIF-1
for ubiquitination. To verify this possibility, we performed an in vitro HIF-1
(ODD) ubiquitination assay (Fig. 4A). 35S-labeled HIF-1
(ODD) was ubiquitinated robustly in the presence of VHL (Fig. 4A, lane 3). However, the addition of VLP in S100 extracts devoid of VHL had very minimal or undetectable E3 ligase activity (Fig. 4A, lane 2). The addition of in vitro translated VLP to S100 extracts containing wild-type VHL attenuated the ability of VHL to ubiquitinate HIF-1
(ODD) in a dosage-dependent manner (Fig. 4A, lanes 46). These results indicate that VLP functions as a dominant-negative VHL and protects HIF-1
from ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis.
|
and whether the increased expression of VLP in vivo could block VHL-dependent ubiqutin-mediated destruction of HIF-1
and thereby promote the accumulation of hypoxia-inducible products, such as GLUT1. Multiple stable subclones of U2OS cells (VHL+/+) expressing either empty plasmid or plasmid-expressing HA-VLP were generated. First, the endogenous HIF-1
co-precipitated with HA-VLP during an anti-HA immunoprecipitation (Fig. 4B). Second, as predicted from our in vitro study, mock-transfected cells that express wild-type VHL showed low HIF-1
and GLUT1 levels, while increased expression of VLP resulted in the accumulation of HIF-1
, and consequently overexpressed GLUT1 (Fig. 4, C and D). These results strongly suggest that VLP acts to protect HIF-1
by competing against the destructive targeting initiated by VHL in vivo.
VHL is a vital component of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. Within this multiprotein enzyme, VHL functions as an F-box protein to specifically recognize and bind its substrate, prolyl-hydroxylated HIF-1, 2, and various splice variants of 3
subunits (12, 14, 15, 22). This posttranslational modification of HIF
only occurs in the presence of oxygen and requires the activity of HIF-specific PHD (10, 11, 13, 22). Once HIF
is brought to the close vicinity of an E3 ligase, it is subjected to polyubiquitination with the aid of an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Polyubiquitin-tagged HIF
is then targeted for 26S proteasome-mediated destruction. In limited oxygen tension or lack of dioxygen cofactor, PHD fails to hydroxylate HIF
. Thus, preventing its recognition by the VHL E3 ligase complex and consequently HIF
escapes destruction. The now-stable HIF
binds constitutively expressed HIFß/ARNT to form an active HIF transcription factor to activate numerous hypoxia-inducible genes, triggering our physiological responses to hypoxia (1).
The regulation of HIF is further complicated by the fact that under reduced oxygen tension, asparagine remains unhydroxylated (25). This allows transcriptional co-activators CBP/p300 to bind HIF-1
to form an efficient transcriptional complex with ARNT (25). The fact that there are now multiple HIF
subunits as well as multiple posttranslational modifications of HIF
, which are intricately linked to the availability of oxygen, suggest that oxygen homeostasis is not only critical but also complex and requires multiple levels of regulation. Adding to this complexity is our finding that a VHL-homologous gene VLP encodes a protein that acts as a dominant-negative VHL. Unlike VHL, VLP binds HIF-1
irrespective of its prolyl hydroxylation status and demonstrates no E3 ligase activity on HIF-1
. Because the non-prolyl-hydroxylated HIF-1
is already stable, it is likely that VLP functions to protect VHL-recognizable prolyl-hydroxylated HIF-1
from degradation. This may occur within a precise range of oxygen gradient where the initiation of the hypoxia response would be desirable, but PHD at this level of oxygen may still be capable of hydroxylating HIF-1
. Thus, the stability and accumulation of HIF-1
would depend on the protective function of VLP by competing against VHL. Alternatively, there may be a requirement of VLP for the proper functioning of HIF.
Neovascularization is crucial for proper placental development. During embryogenesis, while VHL is ubiquitously expressed in all three germ cell layers and their derivatives (28, 29), we have observed significant amount of VLP transcript in the placenta. Furthermore, the embryonic lethality of VHL knockout mice has been attributed to the defective placental vasculogenesis (30). It is tempting to speculate that during placental development, the balance between VHL and VLP is crucial in safeguarding the timely and appropriate level of transcriptional activity of HIF.
Finally, VLP locus is located on 1q21.2 between markers D1S2721 and D1S2635. This region of chromosome 1 is frequently associated with renal diseases. For example, t(X;1)(p11;q21) is often observed in renal clear cell carcinomas (RCCs; 31) and PRCC (papillary renal cell carcinoma) gene, which forms a fusion product with TFE3 on Xp11.2, which is mapped downstream of VLP on 1q21.2 (32, 33). The chromosomal region between D1S2343 and D1S305, just upstream of VLP locus, is linked to the familial papillary thyroid carcinoma/papillary renal neoplasia (fPTC/PRC) phenotype (34). A locus between D1S2696 and D1S2653 on 1q21 is associated with an autosomal dominant form of progressive renal failure and hypertension (35). Furthermore, 1q21-31 is frequently amplified in primary RCCs, especially in metastatic RCCs (36). It will be important to determine whether VLP is dysregulated or overexpressed in certain forms of kidney cancer.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cells
786-O RCC subclones stably transfected to produce wild-type pVHL or transfected with empty plasmid were as previously described (37, 38). Osteosarcoma U2OS (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) subclones stably transfected with pcDNA-HA-VLP or empty plasmid were selected under DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum containing G418 (500 µg/ml). Renal carcinoma ACHN cells were obtained from ATCC and cultured in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Antibodies
Monoclonal anti-Gal4 (DBD; RK5C1) and anti-HA (12CA5) antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., (Santa Cruz, CA) and Roche (Indianapolis, IN), respectively. Monoclonal anti-HIF-1
, anti-Cul2, and polyclonal anti-GLUT1 antibodies were obtained from Novus Biologicals (Littleton, CO), Zymed (South San Francisco, CA) and Alpha Diagnostic Intl. Inc. (San Antonio, TX), respectively. Polyclonal (R98) and monoclonal (IG32) anti-VHL antibodies were described previously (38).
Plasmids
The generation of mammalian expression plasmids pRc-CMV-HA-VHL, pcDNA3-HA-HIF-1
(Full-length/P564A/
ODD), and pcDNA3-Gal4-HA-HIF-1
-ODD(WT/P-A) was described previously (9). To generate pcDNA3-HA-VLP(WT) and pcDNA3-VLP(WT), the ORF of VLP was PCR-amplified using forward primers 5'-GACGACGGATCCCCCTGGAGAGCGGGGAAC-3', 5'-GACGACGGATCCATGCCCTGGAGAGCGGGGAAC-3' and reverse primer 5'-GACGACGAATTCTCAGGGTATACACTGCAGT-3' and inserted into BamHI/EcoRI sites of pcDNA3-HA plasmid. pcDNA3-HA-VHL(111SYRG114-NFRS) and pcDNA3-HA-VLP(92NFRS95-SYRG) were generated using Stratagene QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (La Jolla, CA) and the following primer sets: 5'-CATCCACAACTTCCGAAGTCACCTTTG-3'/5'-CAAAGGTGACTTCGGAAGTTGTGGATG-3' and 5'-CTTCCGCATCCACAGCTACCGAGGCCACCCTTGGCTC-3'/5'-GAGCCAAGGGTGGCCTCGGTAGCTGTGGATGCGGAAG-3', respectively. All plasmids made by PCR were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Northern Blot Analysis
VLP and VHL probes for the human multiple tissue northern (MTN) blot (Clontech) were derived from BamHI/EcoRI fragments of pcDNA3-HA-VLP and pcDNA3-T7-VHL, respectively, and labeled with 32P-dCTP using the DECAprime II random priming kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). The multiple tissue northern blot was incubated in a hybridization buffer for 30 min and then the labeled probe was added (2 x 106 cpm/ml) for approximately 1 h at 68°C. The membrane was washed 3 times in 2x SSC [0.3 M NaCl, 0.03 M sodium citrate (pH 7.0)] and 0.05% SDS for 30 min, and 2 times in 0.1x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 50°C for 40 min. VLP bands were visualized by autoradiography. ß-Actin was subsequently probed as a loading control.
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting were performed as described previously (39). In brief, cells were lysed in EBC buffer [50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 120 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP40] supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche). Immunoprecipitates, immobilized on protein A-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden), were washed 5 times with NETN buffer [20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 120 mM NaCl, 1 mM ETDA, 0.5% NP40], eluted by boiling in SDS-containing sample buffer, and separated on SDS-PAGE.
Purification of HIF PHD
Extracts containing enriched PHD were purified from rabbit reticulocyte lysate as previously described (13).
In Vitro Binding Assay
Assay for binding of HIF-1
to VHL and VLP was performed as previously described (9, 40). Reticulocyte lysate translation products were synthesized in the presence (for pcDNA3-HA-VHL and pcDNA3-HA-VLP) or absence [for various pcDNA3-HA-HIF-1
(FL), pcDNA3-HA-HIF-1
(ODD), pcDNA3-HA-HIF-1
(P564A), pcDNA3-Gal4-HA-HIF-1
(ODD), and pcDNA3-HA-Gal4-HIF-1
(ODD; P564A)] of 35S-methionine. The various HIF-1
translation products were treated with or without cellular fractions containing enriched PHD for 30 min at 37°C. The various HIF-1
(10 µl) and VHL or VLP (10 µl) translation products were incubated with anti-HIF-1
or anti-Gal4 antibody and protein A-Sepharose in 750 µl of EBC buffer [50 mM Tris (pH 8), 120 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP40]. After five washes with NETN buffer [20 mM Tris (pH 8), 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP40, 1 mM EDTA], the bound proteins were resolved on SDS-PAGE and detected by autoradiography. Binding assay of biotinylated HIF-1
residue 556575 with either hydroxyproline 564 or P564A substitution to VHL or VLP was performed as previously described (12).
In Vitro Ubiquitination Assay
In vitro ubiquitination assay was performed as previously described (9). 35S-methionine-labeled reticulocyte lysate Gal4-HA-HIF-1
(ODD) translation products (4 µl) were incubated in RCC 786-O S100 extracts [100150 µg; prepared as previously described (9)] supplemented with 8 µg/µl of ubiquitin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 100 ng/µl of ubiquitin-aldehyde (BostonBiochem, Cambridge, MA), and an ATP-regenerating system [20 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 2 mM ATP, 5 mM MgCl2, 40 mM creatine phosphate, 0.5 µg/µl of creatine kinase] in a reaction volume of 2030 µl for 1.5 h at 30°C.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Notes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received May 15, 2003; revised December 4, 2003; accepted December 8, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
targeted for VHL-mediated destruction by proline hydroxylation: implications for O2 sensing. Science, 292: 464468, 2001.
to the von Hippel-Lindau ubiquitylation complex by O2-regulated prolyl hydroxylation. Science, 292: 468472, 2001.
chains activated by prolyl hydroxylation. EMBO J., 20: 51975206, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
binding and ubiquitylation by the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 2573325741, 2000.
-class hypoxia inducible factor subunit, HIF3
. Gene Expr., 7: 205213, 1998.[Medline]
in human kidney: suppression of HIF-mediated gene expression by HIF-3
. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 287: 808813, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
locus. J. Biol. Chem., 277: 3240532408, 2002.
locus are targets of the VHL E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. J. Biol. Chem., 278: 1103211040, 2003.
-pVHL complex: hydroxyproline recognition in signaling. Science, 296: 18861889, 2002.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. E. Banks, P. Tirukonda, C. Taylor, N. Hornigold, D. Astuti, D. Cohen, E. R. Maher, A. J. Stanley, P. Harnden, A. Joyce, et al. Genetic and Epigenetic Analysis of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) Gene Alterations and Relationship with Clinical Variables in Sporadic Renal Cancer Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 66(4): 2000 - 2011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Wenger, D. P. Stiehl, and G. Camenisch Integration of Oxygen Signaling at the Consensus HRE Sci. Signal., October 18, 2005; 2005(306): re12 - re12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |